On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 01:19:43 -0400 "Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)" <[email protected]> wrote:
:>In <listserv%[email protected]>, on 06/02/2011 :> at 12:38 PM, Scott Fagen <[email protected]> said: :>>Exactly, IBM offers an interface and rules of engagement which the :>>ISVs have to follow for zIIP offload capability. At CA Technologies :>>we carefully evaluate "what" and "how" we offload to specialty :>>processors to abide by that agreement. This is further bulwarked by :>>our omnipresent legal staff. :>Does IBM legal have a vendor representatives to whom you can send :>queries as to the legality of proposed new facilities? That would seem :>to be in the interests of IBM, the ISVs and the customers. One wonders how they would be able to do this while at the same time design competing features. Or recognize this and restrict it by contract. -- Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, especially those from irresponsible companies. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
