If you look at the STARTIO macro you need to supply IOSB and SRB.
You need to feel all the value in the IOSB and the SRB.
You need to fix your CCW and change all the address to real.
You need to supply routine which will receive control in some stage of the
IO. (PCI, END, ERROR etc..).
You need to comply with the bits in the IOSB and the routines and your CCW.

I am sure that if you dig in the internet maybe you will see some example
about it.
I do not understand why there is no example of startio.
The only reason  is that the STARTIO is not so famous compare to EXCP, EXCPR
and all the other access methods.
Very small number of users will want to deal with STARTIO.
developing STARTIO will crash your system many times until it will work.

Shai

On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Lindy Mayfield <[email protected]
> wrote:

> did you ever consider writing up some documentation for STARTIO for those
> of us who don't have the brain power to reverse engineer the macro?
>
> i think it would be a wonderful contribution to the mainframe community if
> you ever find the time to do that.
>
> regards
> lindy
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: shai hess [[email protected]]
> Sent: 19 June 2011 18:45
> To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List (E-mail); [email protected]
> Subject: Some tests with MFNetDisk PRO
>
>
> One of our user run test for MFNetDisk PRO.
>
>  PANMVS(REXX$BAT42)      LRECL=80,BLKSIZE=4000,RECFM=FB
>   DE42    150,000 records         12 seconds      IBM DS6800 Storage
>
>   MPC000  150,000 records         17 seconds      XP hard drive C
>  MFNetDisk PRO
>   MPC000  150,000 records         36 seconds      XP hard drive C
>  MFNetDisk PRO
>   MPC000  150,000 records         36 seconds      XP hard drive C
>  MFNetDisk PRO
>   MPC000  150,000 records         25 seconds      XP hard drive C MFNetDisk
> PRO
>   MPC000  150,000 records         21 seconds      XP hard drive C MFNetDisk
> PRO
>   MPC000  150,000 records         22 seconds      XP hard drive C MFNetDisk
> PRO
>
>  With the standard MFNetDisk the elapse time was 90 seconds.
>
>  Any idea why the result in the PRO run from 17-36 second? Is it TCP issue?
>
>  Thanks,
>  Shai
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
> Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to