In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 12/08/2005
at 08:38 AM, "Pommier, Rex R." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I know the purists out there will jump on me for saying it is an
>empty address
No, the purists will jump on you for presuming to speak for the
purists.
>for saying it is an empty address space
No, that's not why we'll jump on you.
>because system libraries, etc, are already there <g>,
FSVO there. They don't appear in the new TIOT unless you have DD
statements for them in your JCL. Similarly, the new address space has
no ENQ for them.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
