Then, the easiest way to guarantee N jobs running concurrently is going back to JES2 managed jobclasses and start N initiators. The N jobs will run, but not necessaraly perform. But if that's what they want...
Kees. ""??? ?? ???"" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<c11ded818b17214792b97fba28712bed04fa69c...@jer-email1.jer.ad.malam .com>... > Believe me, we've tried, but they 'know best' > > > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL > Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 4:16 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Managing WLM manged initiators > > >Because sometimes the client says that they want to see n number of jobs in a certain class running. > >We know that it might not be the best thing, but the client is always right. > > You need to convince them (if you can) that performance experts know better. > Having more jobs in a class than the WLM has determined optimum: > 1. Can lead to over-initiation. > 2. Doesn't guarantee the class throughput will improve. > 3. Can impact other classes, or workloads. > > As long as service levels are met, all else is secondary. > > PS: What happens if there aren't "N" jobs in the system? > - > Ted MacNEIL > [email protected] > Twitter: @TedMacNEIL > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > > ????? ???, ????? ????? ????? ??????? ?????? ??, ?? ????, ???????? ?? ??? ???? ?????, ??????? ???? ???? ????? ?? ??? ????? ?????? ?? ?????, ????? ?? ???? ????? ?? ??? ?????? ??????? ????? ?????. ????? ???? ????? (????? ???? ????) ?????? ?????? ???? ???????? ???, ??? ????? ????? ?????? ??? ???? ????? ?????, > ???? ?????? ???? ?????? ????? ????? ?? ?????? ?????. > > > Please note that in accordance with Malam's signatory rights, no offer, agreement, concession or representation is binding on the company, > unless accompanied by a duly signed separate document (or a scanned version thereof), affixed with the company's seal. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ******************************************************** For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 33014286 ******************************************************** ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
