Unfortunately the SyzEMAIL part of things is different depending on which implementation is used which means that we would end up with maintaining two completely different SyzEMAIL programs which are drastically different, but so close in function that it's possible that things could get confused.
Originally I had thought that I would call one SyzNTFY instead, but that was not very well received. From a marketing standpoint it makes sense to give the site the choice (that's how I designed it originally), but from a maintenance standpoint, I can see where it might be confusing to try to keep things right. So I "understand" why they want only one path, (not that I agree with it completely), so unless I can think of a "better" option, I just have to choose one of the first two. Brian ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
