In
<CAArMM9RrZcMKjeEDNhWu1nm7m-dM=erwben_z2k3adka5s2...@mail.gmail.com>,
on 07/19/2011
at 09:50 PM, Tony Harminc <[email protected]> said:
>Well... I don't know, but I speculate that the failure to load most
>REFR modules into store-protected storage in the early days was an
>attempt to avoid providing an easy to use mechanism for unauthorized
>programs to put arbitrary data into protected storage.
No. In the OS/360 days the operating system only looked at REFR for
SVC routines.
>In MVT (and SVS for that matter), if you could build a DEB in
>key-zero storage it would be accepted based only on the storage
>key,
MVT didn't check the storage key of the DEB.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
