In <[email protected]>, on 07/31/2011
at 12:31 AM, CM Poncelet <[email protected]> said:
>I'm afraid I disagree.
Because you are confusing the DSCB with the blocks written in the
dataset.
>What it proves is not that the DCB on DASD was
>overwritten by the one in the JCL, but that the DCB in the JCL was
>incorrect/incompatible with the one on DASD.
Why would you get an I/O error if the DCB information on the DD
statement did not take precedence over that in the DSCB?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
