Ronald, First of all you really should get into the habit of using "their" as the 3rd plural possessive pronoun in place of "there", the opposite of "here" and so on ... If you want people's help you should not be obliging them to puzzle over the grammar of your sentences. As they say, 1 is an accident, 2 is careless but how do we describe 3? - sorry - I checked again - 4!
>From the CS IP and SNA Codes manual, which I'm sure you consulted, I find the following: <quote> 1.1.1.32 Sense code 0821 Session parameters not valid: Session parameters included on a BIND were not valid or not supported by the half-session whose activation was requested. The session parameters are usually obtained from the logmode table entry. Bytes 2 and 3 following the sense code contain sense-code-specific information. 0000 No specific code applies. VTAM Hint: Possible causes of this error include, but are not limited to, the following: - Sessions cannot log on to CICS. <In the interests of brevity I have removed the paragraph following which refers to CICS autoinstall> - The PLU has rejected the BIND session parameters. - The cryptographic function referenced in the logmode table entry is not active in all SSCPs involved in establishing the session. <end quote> You should always use this manual for sense codes involving VTAM since those "VTAM Hints" can often be just what you need. Probably you are suffering from the second case, namely that NetView doesn't like the BIND image with which it was presented. The BIND image is that defined by the logmode table entry which is specified at the secondary LU. I don't know TPX - isn't it some sort of 3270 multi-session program? - but I expect, indeed hope, that the APPL to which you are referring is the APPL statement which represents the application secondary LU pretending to be a 3270 display LU. The normal rules for logmode table entry apply in that the name can, generally, in the case of an application program, be specified in program customization; if blank, then by the DLOGMOD operand of the APPL statement; then, if still blank, by the first entry in the applicable logmode table, either the LOGMODE operand of the APPL statement of, if not specified, the first entry in ISTINCLM. If the logmode table entry is named by the application or by the DLOGMOD operand of the APPL statement, it must exist in either the logmode table named by the LOGMODE operand of the APPL statement of, if not specified, ISTINCLM. I checked my table for this topic to be sure I got it right and I noted some exceptions which do not affect this case - in case anyone still reading this may have wished to make that point. Perhaps you can customize TPX so that, when the primary application is NetView, you can specify a particular logmode table name. Maybe the quickest way to work out what is acceptable to NetView is to use the logmode table entry name which you use when you log onto NetView directly from a real or emulated 3270. As a last resort you can even consult the NetView manuals - although NetView and logmode table entries has moved on a great deal from the days when NetView was very restrictive and even insisted on the name DSILGMOD - if I remember correctly back 15 years or so. I am actually a touch surprised that a logmode table entry that other 3270-supporting applications - such as TSO and CICS with autoinstall I expect - can accept is not acceptable by NetView. Talking about the "normal rules for logmode table entry selection", haven't we been here before together recently regarding TELNET 3270 secondary applications? Incidentally, this is either a NetView or a VTAM issue if there is no suitable TPX newsgroup. For VTAM you might try ibm.networking.vtam which you can subscribe to via URL http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=2192&context=SSRRLB&dc=D700&uid=swg27005100&loc=en_US&cs=utf-8&lang=en or for NetView there is http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NetView/ . Chris Mason ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ronald G wells" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, 14 December, 2005 6:14 PM Subject: TPX-Netview Sense 08210000 > Trying setup of CA-TPX .. seem to login to most everything with exception > of Netview... > > Figured it is a logmode issue but wondered if someone else ran into this... > login to netview from TPX I get 08210000...using there(TPX) T3278M2 logmode > tried to change TPX to use SNX32702 changing there APPL def for terminal > but complains about there LOGMODE not being found?? > SO I gather there is something in there setup locking in logmode name and > just changing APPL statement does not do it...next I guess is to add there > logmode to libraray Netview looks at..CORRECT?? > Unless someone know right off where in TPX I can get it to point to > logmode I want to use...since APPL statement change did not work..have > call into Vendor(CA)...and that will take awhile so I thought I'd try here > too... > any help would be appreciated.. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
