In <[email protected]>,
on 08/04/2011
at 11:03 AM, "van der Grijn, Bart (B)" <[email protected]> said:
>I believe Anne mentioned something about PARMJOBC containing the
>address to a field with x0..08, rather than the actual value.
Even if she meant that it contained the address of 00 00 00 08, the
ICM would not load a value of 8, but rather 0. Is it possible that
PARMJOBC was the address of 00 00 08?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
