In <[email protected]>, on 08/11/2011
at 04:04 PM, Rick Fochtman <[email protected]> said:
>I respectfully submit that the use of SVC 32 is archaic and
>cumbersome and should be discouraged in favor of DYNALLOC (SVC 99)
>whenever possible.
I said that it was possible; I didn't recommend it.
>How many of our list participants are sufficiently skillful to
>construct a partial DSCB correctly?
Probably a dozen. ObRobertZimmerman Of those, how many would actually
do it in a production environment.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
