> -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL > Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 11:48 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: CA7 Question > >
<snip> > > These days all our applications are 31-bit, so > it doesn't matter which. The virtual storage > overhead from the initiator doesn't mean > anything when you are not running 24-bit code. > -teD > Me? A skeptic? I trust you have proof! Hum, I wonder about that (but don't know). I think that it is still true that a JES2 logical initiator is not "bound" to a specific initiator started task (ASID). So, a "CICS" initiator (ASID) could have had some batch jobs run in it before running the CICS job. If so, this could mean that some errant "system" type code (APF or exit) might have left a "sand bar" in the 31-bit portion of the address space. If so, it might end up that a CICS region would have significantly reduced 31-bit space in the region. Of course, this is the "devil's advocate" position of a very unlikely theoritical situation. -- John McKown Senior Systems Programmer UICI Insurance Center Information Technology This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and its' content is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this transmission, or taking any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
