On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 05:46:43 -0500, John McKown wrote: >Oh, agreed! But I'm pragmatic. If IBM is going to eliminate the TSO >version, it is at least good to know that there is a work around. Like >many of my wishes for a native UNIX version of TSO commands. To which >many TSO oriented people say: "Just use the TSO version and don't worry >about it.". So I'll reverse it on "dig". Just use the UNIX version and >don't worry about it. <grin> > >On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 10:46 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: >> >> >Just asking: Could a TSO user use OSHELL to run those UNIX commands? >> >Would such use require that the user have an OMVS segment? >> >> Yes to both. But it would be cleaner to have the native TSO commands >> we have today. >> Would a front end to the UNIX command, perhaps in Rexx, be feasible? I fear not because the terminal I/O models of TSO and UNIX are so incompatible.
-- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
