Allan, I did use the Install command, see first line of output.
-----Original Message----- From: Staller, Allan [mailto:allan.stal...@kbmg.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 11:36 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Problem with HSM Recalls Looks like you need to use the INSTALL command, not the INIT command. See " 2.1.1.3 Setting an IBM 3390 to 3380 track compatibility mode" in GC35-0033-25 (ICKDSF R17 dated 12-14-02) Al Staller | Z Systems Programmer | KBM Group | (Tel) 972 664 3565 | allan.stal...@kbmg.com -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C] Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 10:21 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Problem with HSM Recalls Tom, Allan, I'm getting the following trying to test your suggestions: INSTALL UNIT(1091) VFY(NW1091) SETMODE(3380) ICK00700I DEVICE INFORMATION FOR 1091 IS CURRENTLY AS FOLLOWS: PHYSICAL DEVICE = 3390 STORAGE CONTROLLER = 2105 STORAGE CONTROL DESCRIPTOR = E8 DEVICE DESCRIPTOR = 0A ADDITIONAL DEVICE INFORMATION = 4A000035 TRKS/CYL = 15, # PRIMARY CYLS = 3339 ICK04000I DEVICE IS IN SIMPLEX STATE ICK00091I 1091 NED=002105. .HTC.65.000000045342 ICK03091I EXISTING VOLUME SERIAL READ = NW1091 ICK31054I DEVICE NOT SUPPORTED FOR THE SPECIFIED FUNCTION ICK30003I FUNCTION TERMINATED. CONDITION CODE IS 12 11:12:57 09/20/11 Am I missing something or is this a no-go given my hardware? The address 1091 is currently a 3390 mod-3 on a HDS 9990V marketed by Oracle/Sun/STK. Thanks, Dave O'Brien -----Original Message----- From: Tom Marchant [mailto:m42tom-ibmm...@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 10:52 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Problem with HSM Recalls On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 10:18:12 -0400, O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C] wrote: >Message ARC1001I also precedes this message, giving the operation in >process, the name of the data set, and a reason code. > >Reascode Meaning >8 Direct access data records exceed the track capacity of the > output device. > >Attempting to recover the backup with a rename results in > >ARC1001I SYSMGT.D93132.N001606 RECOVER FAILED, RC=0008, REAS=0168 >ARC1108I ERROR CATALOGING DATA SET > >The data was migrated in the early 90's, I don't see how the current track capacity could be exceeded. Of course no one is here who is knowledgeable of what was done. >I'm open to suggestions. If the data set originally resided on a 3380 and it has a very small blocksize, you might see this. For example, if it has a blocksize of 80, a 3380 track will hold 83 blocks but a 3390 will only hold 78. -- Tom Marchant ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
