Shmuel: Yes, your absolutely correct it was in IKJTSO00 which has a bad command in , syntax wise. Removed, it reactivated it and worked first shot.. Thanks everyone..My old age is getting me ...lol
Scott J Ford Software Engineer http://www.identityforge.com From: Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 3:16 PM Subject: Re: TSO Receive command In <[email protected]>, on 09/27/2011 at 10:30 AM, Scott Ford <[email protected]> said: >I know this must be simple, but just went to z/OS 1.12 and whe I >enter 'Receive' in TSo Option # 6 There is no "TSO Option 6". ITYM ISPF primary option 6. > INMR057I RECEIVE command terminated because it was not invoked >authorized. Which IKJTSOxx member is active? >I reviewed IKJTSO00 Are you sure that it is active? Remember that it can be dynamically changed. >and Receive is there. Are you sure that there isn't a preceding syntax error? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
