Page fault that means it does't have to be fixed unless I just don't get it
-----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 6:32 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: SRBEPA In <cakxahqwwofk2cmeed1akporkeytzvz-_iq5pk1kmi3bb8fx...@mail.gmail.com>, on 10/17/2011 at 11:27 AM, Chris Craddock <[email protected]> said: >On the other hand; If you are trying to schedule an SRB into >-any-other- address space, then (somehow) you have to make sure >the code will be addressable when the SRB is dispatched. In >general that means loading it into common storage (technically it >should be in SQA rather than CSA, but that's a minor nit) Why? As long as the address is accessible and the code will be addressable, why can't it be private and pagable? MVS can handle a page fault in an SRB routine. Now, if you're going to schedule SRB's into multiple address spaces for the same routine, then you would want the code in common so that you only need a single copy. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
