Many folks use another SPOOL browser and drop SDSF to reduce software costs. I use IOF and SYSVIEW for historical reasons but E(JES) would work as well or better. We dropped SDSF a couple years ago since it duplicated functionality of the other products and had a limited user base compared to IOF.
E(JES) http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/ejes.htm IOF http://www.triangle-systems.com/iofwhy.shtml SYSVIEW http://www.ca.com/us/performance-management.aspx You may also get a good response on this and related topics in the ISVCOSTS forum http://www-03.ibm.com/software/solutions/isvcosts/ See Discussion Group sign-up. Best Regards, Sam Knutson, GEICO System z Team Leader mailto:[email protected] (office) 301.986.3574 (cell) 301.996.1318 "Think big, act bold, start simple, grow fast..." -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ivanno Alexander Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2011 7:18 PM To: [email protected] Subject: SDSF versus (E)JES Hello. Does any of you guys use (E)JES and dropped the IBM payment of SDSF? Regards, Ivan ==================== This email/fax message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this email/fax is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all paper and electronic copies of the original message. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
