As originally published in the JIR, The Journal for Irreproducible Research, from the Society for Irreproducible Research, at least three decades ago, comparing Oranges to Apples, to imply non-similarity is not valid; if you consider their mass, conductivity, specific gravity, density, energy content, moisture content, value per gram, and many other physical attribute they are far more similar than dissimilar. If you wish to compare apples, that original article suggest, do it with England, Envelopes, or Orgasms.
Barry Merrill -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2011 8:47 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Expiration date In <7A64EE34BA2BDC4093CCA94CE3153E6F06767A@TMPEXCHMB06.enterprise.corpad.timein c.com>, on 12/02/2011 at 04:43 PM, Hervey Martinez <[email protected]> said: >Does anybody know as to what takes precedence under SMS, either an >expiration date(on a disk dataset) or "expire non-usage" on a >management class? Isn't that an apples to oranges comparison? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
