On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 10:42:02 -0800, Donald Zeunert wrote:
>
>>Re: Eight-character TSO Userid Support
>>
>>One item that has not been mentioned.  The 7 char TSO userid was so that when 
>>you submit batch jobs it automatically appended 1 char to make a unique 
>>jobname to execute.  If your TSOID is 8 then and you submitted a batch job it 
>>would either have to have > 8 char jobname, same and you'd have to logoff for 
>>it to run, or something not associated w/ your userid which would require 
>>SDSF or 3rd party spool product RACF (SAF) rules to allow you to view it.  If 
>>jobname becomes > 8 that impacts lots of SMF records, RACF(SAF) rules, and 
>>lets not forget the 80 character punch card limitation for those pushing for 
>>24 char userids.  I know some sites already use TSO batch job names w/o TSOID 
>>prefix, but these are still 8 char names that need to be unique.
>>
> This topic entirely mystifies me.  I'm looking at the SDSF STATUS display 
> which
> shows me 123 of my jobs (I need to clean up).  Of these, 110 do _not_ begin
> with my userid, including one which I just submitted with the SUBMIT primary
> command from an ISPF VIEW panel.  13 do begin with my user ID, including
> my TSO session and several that I recall submitting other than from a TSO/ISPF
> SUBMIT command.
>
> I don't know why people entertain this fantasy of a UserID+1  job name rule
> and use it as a refutation of the possibility of 8-character userids.
>
> -- gil
In TSO ISPF SDSF, you can type SET DISPLAY ON to show your seleciton
criteria.  You probably have OWNER=userid PREFIX=*.  This result is a
good bypass to allow 8 character TSO userids.
-- 
Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to