In a recent note, Brian Peterson said:
> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 12:17:21 -0600
>
> Well, well, well....I was *sure* that this could not be done. Wrong.
>
I was similarly surprised to learn this within the past year.
> So, the answer appears to be "yes", IBM could send electronic updates to
> ++HOLD information. Today they do not do this, but SMP/E itself apparently
> supports this.
>
??? Are you expecting anything different from what's available
electronically at, e.g.:
ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/s390/holddata/month.txt
(which contains _no_ ++HOLD ... SYSTEM.)
It would be even better, of course, if affected customers could be
notified proactively. But this returns us to the question, "Whom
to notify?"
-- gil
--
StorageTek
INFORMATION made POWERFUL
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
