I am writing some new code. It is a z/OS UNIX command, and so I feel that using "old" facilities for backwards compatability is not really an issue. Just as I have heard people say that using STORAGE OBTAIN/RELEASE is "better" than GETMAIN/FREEMAIN, is using ISGENQ OBTAIN/RELEASE "better" than using ENQ/DEQ? It does appear to have some nice enhancements over ENQ/DEQ for the "average" (non authorized) user.
-- John McKown Systems Engineer IV IT Administrative Services Group HealthMarkets(r) 9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010 (817) 255-3225 phone * [email protected] * www.HealthMarkets.com Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message may contain confidential or proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. HealthMarkets(r) is the brand name for products underwritten and issued by the insurance subsidiaries of HealthMarkets, Inc. -The Chesapeake Life Insurance Company(r), Mid-West National Life Insurance Company of TennesseeSM and The MEGA Life and Health Insurance Company.SM ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
