Exactly, John
Sent from my iPad Scott Ford Senior Systems Engineer www.identityforge.com On Jan 21, 2012, at 1:27 PM, John Gilmore <[email protected]> wrote: > It may perhaps be time to restate the obvious. > > LINKLST has come to be used in situations remote from its original > narrow focus, which was to improve real and virtual program-fetch > performance from certain system datasets. > > It does this well, but it was never intended that volatile program > libraries---those some of the members of which are frequently > replaced---be included in it. > > The natural, appropriate update time for LINKLST is IPL time, Some > sysprogs in some shops may well be able to cheat on this in some > situations; but the competence and judg[e]ment required to do so are > personal; and these cheats should not be institutionalized; in > particular, their use should never be delegated to people of 'junior > understanding'. They should probably not even be talked about much. > > So far as I can judge from what has been posted here, the real problem > is not an arcane, PDSE-related one. It is that some libraries that do > not belong there have made their way into LINKLST. > > John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA > > -- > John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
