In <[email protected]>, on
01/23/2012
at 09:08 AM, "Staller, Allan" <[email protected]> said:
>Beware of IOSQ! From the viewpoint of the Operating System, you now
>have 3 times as much data behind the actuator on Mod-9's as Mod-3's.
>If the Operating system *thinks* the device is busy, the IO is queued
>off the UCB and never even tried until it comes to head of queue.
The relevance of that depends on the number of exposures.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
