Ted MacNEIL wrote:
It's not really an "OK, so...". IBM was
attempting to keep everything with the same
release name/number to reduce confusion.
I think this is an example where that failed.
We have enough issues on precision, causing
problems. Why add more?
<snip>
It's quite true that we try to get everyone to call z/OS elements
by names consistent with the z/OS release in which they are
included to prevent confusion.
But this product is not part of z/OS, and I have no control over
its name (or, for that matter, any other name). The product
we're talking about is the "IBM XML Toolkit for z/OS, V1.8."
The word "for" and the comma are both significant in the name.
--
John Eells
z/OS Technical Marketing
IBM Poughkeepsie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
