>As to whether a null reply in the reported case would have reverted SAD to >the original values, I think we're all looking to Barbara to answer her >own question. ;-)
I love it when you guys do that to me! :-) Especially as I was too fast to remedy the situation by reallocating everything before I had figured out what I should have answered those prompts with! Jim Mulder must be on vacation - I had hoped he could confirm this for me. As far as the sys1.sadmp vs. xxxx.sadmp goes - it might be a remnant of when we first took sadumps back to DASD. Since then we didn't go to new DASD hardware, so it is kind of understandable that I wasn't aware of this, especially as I wasn't involved in the DASD migration. I had caught the sys1.pagedump thing and the wrong unit in the amdsaosg generation, but I missed the reallocation of the output dataset. The general take here is anyway, that sadumps are only there to indulge me. Why we use the SMS-managed HLQ, I have no clue. I had been told way back when that that was the only way to go multivolume or whatever. I am reluctant to change this now, since it had worked so far (other than this last attempt). Barbara ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
