Mary Anne,
With respect, when responding to the likes of "Tom" and "Don",
it would be helpful if you would quote at least a little of their posts
for both identification and context, especially when your response
is a day later.
In particular, I had trouble locating Tom as he posts as "Pinnacle".
Thanks for your understanding.
> Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 06:09:06 -0600
> From: maryanne4...@gmail.com
> Subject: Re: Request for comments on the GDG IEFAB461 exit
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by this Tom. You can create several GDG levels and
> refer to them via (+n) in later steps. Perhaps that wasn't available back in
> the day though.
>
> Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 06:07:37 -0600
> From: maryanne4...@gmail.com
> Subject: Re: Request for comments on the GDG IEFAB461 exit
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
>
> Don,
> I think the issue is, the zap is already on, and sites are stuck with
> supporting it. For them to change would be an interrogation of each job that
> uses GDG's. They've kept using it all these years, so clearly they don't want
> to tackle that. Whether or not it was a good idea is a 'moo' point. :)
> Another issue is if it would be at all beneficial to any other sites.
> If implemented properly, 'normal' sites would see no difference, and the
> sites using the zap would simply have to remove it and set the parameter
> properly.
>
> MA
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
