Johnny,

With regard to this reply to Terry, I can see we've got a long way from USS
tables here and are now trawling the basics of MVS-z/OS. I used to
understand these issues intimately when I ran multiple MVS systems (under
VM) for education and test purposes. Unfortunately I don't any more without
having to reread the manuals. Perhaps Terry can guide you on these MVS
issues.

I would advise that, until you are familiar with APF etc., you follow the
path the ADCD system designers want you to take and use the USER HLQ
libraries for the moment.

Back to USS issues: The USSN load module must reside in a library in the
VTAMLIB concatenation - for the purposes of CS SNA (VTAM). I believe - you
should check this - that the USSN load module must reside in a library in
the STEPLIB concatenation of the appropriate procedure, the main TCP/IP
procedure or the TELNET server procedure - for the purposes of CS IP.

Note that, in both cases, VTAM or the TELNET 3270 server, if you change the
name of the USS load module, you will need to find where the name appears in
VTAM or TELNET 3270 server definition statements and change it there also.

The USS 10 message (whet you call the "logon screen") and the rest of the
USS messages and commands are available to what you call "both VTAM and
TCPIP access", in other words, VTAM and the TELNET 3270 server, because
ADCD.ZOSV14S.VTAMLIB is both in the VTAMLIB concatenation and the STEPLIB
concatenation of the appropriate CS IP-related procedure, the main TCP/IP
procedure or the TELNET server procedure. (I guess, if the ADCD system tries
to keep things relatively simple, this will be the main TCP/IP procedure.)
Check it out.

Chris Mason

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Johnny Luo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, 08 January, 2006 1:32 PM
Subject: Re: Manuals on modifying VTAM logon screen?


Terry,thanks for the reply.

1,'The only difference in approach between our two methods is that I created
a USER.ZOSV1R3.VTAMLST, and subsequently a USER.Z16.VTAMLST to hold the
source code and provide consistent naming'

   Weird....Maybe it's the HLQ that makes the difference?
   I checked a book 'MVS System Programming'.It's old but concerning
VTAMLIB,it says
that all library must be 'APF authorized'.As for 'APF',I wonder what on
earth it is and what's
the relationship between APF and RACF.
   Anyway,my guess is that HLQ is relevant on this issue for the 'USER' HLQ
is shipped with
the system and it's the only difference between 'user.**' and
'johnny.**'.However,I dont know
the real reason underlying.

2,'Assembling and linking the USSN into
USER.VTAMLIB means that the modified USSN appears for both VTAM and TCPIP
access'

USSN module must be in USER.VTAMLIB?You know,if you don't do any change,
USER.VTAMLIB
is empty and the sytem finds the module in ADCD.ZOSV14S.VTAMLIB.However,at
that time,
the logon screen seems to be the same for for both VTAM and TCPIP access
too.


--
Best Regards,
Johnny Luo

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to