On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 10:26:33 -0400, Gerhard Postpischil wrote: > >there is one case that I have not seen mentioned - in the dark >ages, under release 21 of OS/360(MVT), IEFBR14 steps on our >system abended with S322. I had to write a special exception >into IEFUTL to allow allocation to complete. > I'm curious. You must have investigated. Is the ABEND
o Because of something IEFBR14 did? o Because of something IEFBR14 didn't do? o Because of some unwarranted assumption made by "[your] system"? o Was there a divide-by-zero error involved? -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
