>DFHSM is a "band aid" we use because we cannot force users to manage their DASD usage. >So, we migrate it from DASD to tape, then eventually delete it. >This is a "political" fix. Other than that, I agree that keeping it DASD resident would be better.
I strongly disagree. Users should be insulated from managing storage. Migration is key, NOT a band-aid. The whole purpose of SMS (the discipline, not the product) is to manage storage cost- effectively. -teD Me? A skeptic? I trust you have proof! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
