Is it possible that Gartner was using older LSPR ratings?

IBM does not publish MIPS ratings (although the published PCI is
curiously close to others published MIPS ratings)

PCI/(MIPS) tends to change depending on the LSPR test version as well as
OS level.

If possible, get them to use IBM published MSUS (Software MSU not
Hardware MSU).  
That is the only number you can prove via SCRT reports even if it is as
meaningless as MIPS. 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email message and any accompanying materials may contain proprietary, 
privileged and confidential information of CIT Group Inc. or its subsidiaries 
or affiliates (collectively, "CIT"), and are intended solely for 
the recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this 
communication, any use, disclosure, printing, copying or distribution, or 
reliance on the contents, of this communication is strictly prohibited. CIT 
disclaims any liability for the review, retransmission, dissemination or other 
use of, or the taking of any action in reliance upon, this communication by 
persons other than the intended recipient(s). If you have received this 
communication in error, please reply to the sender advising of the error in 
transmission, and immediately delete and destroy the communication and any 
accompanying materials. To the extent permitted by applicable law, CIT and 
others may inspect, review, monitor, analyze, copy, record and retain any 
communications sen!
 t from or received at this email address.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Magen Margalit
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2012 4:08 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: [IBM-MAIN] ISV software costs based on MIPS

Hi list.

Some of out vendors are using Gartner MIPS Rating as the base for
software costs calculations.
I have noticed that prior to Z196 MIPS Ratings the Gartner MIPS number
significantly differed from IBM's LSPR / Sherill Watson CPU Charts
(which is also based on the LSPR data). On Z196 Garner changed their
calculation method to be based on the LSPR values.
When upgrading from a Z10 CPC to the equivalent z196 CPC the MIPS
differences between the CPC models is bigger then actual based on the
Gartner MIPS tables which result in a higher software costs.

Gartner MSU's are based on IBM values.

For Example:

CPC               IBM MIPS       Gartner MIPS     IBM&Gartner MSU's
2097-713        8809             8454                1076  
2817-709        8943             8840                1091            
=================================================
Diff                134 MIPS      386 MIPS            15 MSU

>From the Gartner Z196 MIPS rating table their is note regarding the
calculation method change:

The base performance that IBM uses to come up with system performance
comparisons is the new AVERAGE workload. Gartner will now look at the
AVERAGE workload LSPR results as the base of our MIPS calculation.

1. Are you using Gartner or other method for calculating ISV Vendors
software costs ?
2. Are you aware to the change in the calculation method and how your
organization deals with it? 
    The MIPS difference can result in a major difference in the software
costs?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to