On 5/30/2012 8:43 AM, R.S. wrote:
W dniu 2012-05-30 16:06, Paul Gilmartin pisze:
On Tue, 29 May 2012 22:50:05 +0200, R.S. wrote:
Solution: add SMPJHOME DD to SMPE job.
I'm curious why IBM did not add a DDDEF for that...
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/gimrfr42/4.20
4.20 SMPJHOME
...
No default location is assumed by SMP/E for SMPJHOME.
...
Notes:
1. SMPJHOME can be specified using a DD statement or a DDDEF entry.
Do you mean that sample UCLIN for the product should include a
customizable sample/default SMPJHOME DDDEF?
A reasonable UNIX distribution (in contrast to z/OS USS) would
provide a (customizable) symlink to the current Java libraries
in (e.g.) /usr/lpp/java/...
Well, I found 'jar' program in 9 different locations, including WebSphere - the
product I applied the PTF to. I compared size of the files - it looks I have 9
identical jar's.
I have this objection to RDz or whatever it's called, and Eclipse, the
base for that: I found many copies of the same Java support files
in one installation of the product; I find that senseless bloat of
resources very offensive. Probably in today's world the response is
"get over it", but for a guy who prefers Assembler, that's a big
attitude change; at the very least there should be only a single set
of Java modules used by all the classes in an application (or better,
in a single system).
--
Kind regards,
-Steve Comstock
The Trainer's Friend, Inc.
303-355-2752
http://www.trainersfriend.com
* To get a good Return on your Investment, first make an investment!
+ Training your people is an excellent investment
* Try our tool for calculating your Return On Investment
for training dollars at
http://www.trainersfriend.com/ROI/roi.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
