> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Joel C. Ewing
>
> Why on earth do you persist in asking for specifics about an
> implementation that hasn't been authorized by, or even
> formally proposed to, Congress?
There is a *de facto* "National ID card" known as the "Social Security"
card, which states on its face, "Not for identification".
There is also the passport, but possession of a passport is far less
"mandatory" than possession of a "Social Security" card. Indeed, some
holders of "Social Security" cards are not eligible to hold passports.
It's easy enough to impute ill intent based on the formulation of the
queries posted....
-jc-
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
