If your IEFU29 exit is old, it may be expecting dsnames to be fewer characters (my guess would be 9). If the new dsnames are longer and the exit wasn't changed, then it is possible that you are overwriting storage in your exit. Check your IEFU29 exit to make sure the length of the fields that hold dsnames is long enough to support your new dsnames.
Also, don't forget to try running without the exit to see if all is OK. Don Imbriale >-----Original Message----- >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf >Of Víctor de la Fuente >Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 6:17 AM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: How SMFDUMP works? > >Yes, we changed those dsnames recently... > >2006/1/23, Imbriale, Donald (Exchange) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> It's possible the problem is with your IEFU29 exit. There's an item on >> IBMLink that mentioned this. Try starting SMF without the IEFU29 >> exit. When a switch from one of your SMF dump data sets occurs either >> because the data set is full or you manually switch it, see if the status of >> that data set changes to DUMP REQUIRED as expected. If it does, then you >> can take a look at your IEFU29 exit to see if there's a bug somewhere in >> there. >> >> Did you recently change the dsnames of your SMF dump data sets? >> >> Don Imbriale >> *********************************************************************** Bear Stearns is not responsible for any recommendation, solicitation, offer or agreement or any information about any transaction, customer account or account activity contained in this communication. *********************************************************************** ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
