Ira Broussard wrote:
What it boils down to is that I just want to know why the second (and subsequent) IDENTIFY gives a RC=4 if the loaded module previously came from STEPLIB and a RC=8 if the loaded module previously came from the LPA. Remember that in both scenarios, the entry point address for the second IDENTIFY is always the same as was used on the first IDENTIFY and the processing is always being done by an unauthorized program.
If I may hazard a guess: some versions of MVS build an LPA CDE for an alias entry point that is not flagged as a minor, and may or may not have a link to the major CDE instead of the extent list pointer. If that's the case in your version, it would explain the code 8?
Gerhard Postpischil Bradford, VT ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
