On Thu, 2006-01-26 at 14:23 +0100, R.S. wrote: > Answer to message body: In fact I don't understand your intention. What > do you want to get ? I believe, that IDCAMS abend is not the goal,
I seem to recall that e.g. SORT and FDR both have options to ABEND in lieu of returning a severe RC. Marco probably wishes for something similar in IDCAMS. This can be useful behavior if you are lazy and don't want to code COND= in all your JCL. Maybe a wrapper program will do the trick: ATTACHX EP=IDCAMS,ECB=ATCHECB, ... ST R1,ATCHTCB WAIT ECB=ATCHECB LA R1,ATCHTCB DETACH (1) CLC ATCHECB+1(3),=XL3'00' Subtask terminated well? JNE ABEND No, take action (ABEND?) -- David Andrews A. Duda and Sons, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
