On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 01:29:09 -0500, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Robert A. Rosenberg") wrote:
At 12:37 -0800 on 02/01/2006, Barry Schwarz wrote about
Re: SMP/E SE37 Retry and ++ZAP:
Which can often be resolved with an intervening RESTORE.
There is only one MAJOR DESIGN problem IMO with the
current implementation of RESTORE - It wants to remove too
much as opposed to acting as a way of just removing the
designated SYSMOD (ie: Restoring the system to the state
it would have been in if the SYSMOD had never been APPLY'ed)
Not to mention that if you've RECEIVEd maintenance or
HOLDDATA between the APPLY and the RESTORE, you may find it
difficult (or nearly impossible) to get your system back to
the state just before APPLYing the SYSMOD you want to
RESTORE. Re-APPLYing the rest of the backed-off
maintenance may bring in new SUPs or PE fixes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
