Was there a burst of WTO activity at the time of the IEE012A? Perhaps the burst simply overwhelmed console syslog processing. Perhaps IBM console support would have some idea regarding this issue.
FWIW, on my system, the following value is set: LOG BUFFERS IN USE: 0 LOG BUFFER LIMIT: 9999 Brian On Wed, 8 Feb 2006 14:01:40 -0500, Knutson, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Hi, > >A weird one and a problem for which we have a query into HDS support. > >Has anyone seen message IEE012A issued for no apparent reason when >issuing PPRC commands against HDS DASD? > >A PPRC command was being sent to change the status of a "trigger group". > > >IEA494I 4936,HDSTR2,PPRC PAIR SUSPENDED,SSID=4019,CCA=36 >IEE012A NO LONGER SAVING MESSAGES FOR HARDCOPY, LOGLIM REACHED > >The documented cause for IEE012A is certainly not true. > >Explanation: A VARY SYSLOG,HARDCPY,OFF,UNCOND has previously been >issued. >MVS has saved messages to be hardcopied later, but the limit of LOGLIM >has >been reached. > > > >System Action: Messages issued after this point will not be hardcopied, > >unless LOGLIM is increased, or hardcopy is re-activated. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
