The "best" always wins ... FSVO "best" <g,d,r>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please
delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in
delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to
bind CSC to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit
written agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of
e-mail for such purpose.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"R.S." <R.Skorupka
@BREMULTIBANK.COM.PL>
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN
02/09/2006 03:43 AM
Please respond to IBM Mainframe Discussion List
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Re: z/OS and z/OS.e support withdrawal dates
Timothy Sipples wrote:
[...]
> Let the best technology win, I say. (That'll be situational, of course.
> There are good reasons for having many different types of computers.)
That reminds me OS/2 4 and Windows 3.1.
Did the best technology won ?
Other examples: DEC and Compaq, BeOS, Netscape browser.
Maybe it is not enough to say that ?
Maybe the best technology not necessarily wins, there are other things
to do except the technology ?
My $0.02
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
