In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 02/09/2006
at 04:34 PM, Dave Salt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>If an alternative ISPF interface has been there for decades and
>people aren't using it,
That might be true where they make a conscious decision to not use it.
But what about the many cases where users simply don't know about the
(no longer) new facilities? Nor is the problem limited to ISPF.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
