"MVS % Measured" perhaps... :) It can't be any worse than the 1st attempt they had at FICON Channel Busy :(
> -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Don Deese > Sent: Wednesday, 15 February 2006 10:19 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: LPAR utilization more important than MVS utilization? > > Ron, > > Well, no. MVS Busy is not "wrong" but needs understanding that it is not > the same as CPU Busy. Once its definition is understood, it is as valid > as > any other measure. Maybe a different term would be more acceptable (maybe > we should come up with a description that does not convey "busy" even > though once we understand the meaning, the metric is as clear as CPU Busy). > > For that matter, CPU Busy in LPAR mode has its own share of problems. ;-) > > Don > > > ****** > Don Deese, Computer Management Sciences, Inc. > Voice: (703) 922-7027 Fax: (703) 922-7305 > http://www.cpexpert.org > ****** > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
