SMF 30 records usually contain a program name. Do some chargeback. Hit 'em in the budget.
One cool thing about this solution is that your customer base may deem it enough of a business need to pay the freight. -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Gould Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 2:10 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Redirecting Software Functionality On Feb 16, 2006, at 1:35 PM, Hal Merritt wrote: > Don't forget our old friends in auditing. We are seeing these kinds of > questions. > > I agree: it is a management issue. And audit trumps politics. More, > SOX > holds that the managers of the folks that get sneaky can be held > accountable. > > My $0.02. The other issue that I have seen in this that the copies of modules show up in a common library. It is close to impossible to pinpoint who put them there... Looking through SMF shows hundreds of updates and it gets worse as you don't know *WHEN* it happened. Unless you monitor the library on a daily basis it might be years before you run into the issue. If anyone knows of a way to stop it I would be happy to listen. Ed ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
