Larry Kraus wrote:
I have two CPUs. CPUH and CPUG. Each CPU has two mvs partitions and
one ICF. In my example, CPUH has LPAR1, LPAR2, and COUPLE0H. When
defining the CFP chpid on CPUH ( which will be used to communicate with
CPUG), should COUPLE0H be in the partition access list. Or should it be
defined like a CFS with only the MVS partitions in the access list.
What machines do you have ?
CFP is not available for 9672's (and older).
I assume you have z/machines.
You should define CHPids as CFP.
Those CFPs can be shared or not, your choice. Each chpid can work as
sender and receiver concurrently (that means shared between MVS and CF
LPARs). Sometimes folks decide not to share the chpids for performance
reasons.
The devil is in the details. Do all the partitions belong to same
sysplex ? How many channels do you have ?
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
