I don't have any of the 120s turned on (I'm keeping them off for performance reasons), but, perhaps (just guessing), if you are not running an EJB container, you won't have this type of record activated?
Aaron On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 02:26:02 -0600, Christian Blesa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Hello, > >We would like to review the SMF120_5 and SMF120_6 record and we have >customized WAS v.5 following described steps at WAS docs: > >+BBOM0001I server_SMF_container_activity_enabled: 1. >+BBOM0001I server_SMF_container_interval_enabled: 1. >+BBOM0001I server_SMF_interval_length: 0. >+BBOM0001I server_SMF_server_activity_enabled: 1. >+BBOM0001I server_SMF_server_interval_enabled: 1. >+BBOM0001I server_SMF_web_container_activity_enabled: 1. >+BBOM0001I server_SMF_web_container_interval_enabled: 1. > >SMF Records saved ok: SMF120_1, SMF120_3, SMF120_7 and SMF120_8 >SMF Records saved nok: SMF120_5 and SMF_6 > > >Also, we have applied SMF record exit IEFU83 >http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/tivoli/library/t-wasz-smf/ > >Could you help us? > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
