On Mar 3, 2006, at 12:42 PM, Edward E. Jaffe wrote:
Ed Gould wrote:
There is a discussion going on another list on how to identify a
*HIGH* (data base corruption possibility).
Someone suggestion a HIPER doc APAR IBM came back and said they
would not make a HIPER doc APAR, nor apparently is there a INFO
APAR allowed to be HIPER.
Anybody have a suggestion how IBM might flag an APAR as being
extremely important and could lead to a Data base corruption if it
is not addressed at installation?
Red Alert? https://techsupport.services.ibm.com/server/redAlerts/
Ed,
Its an idea.. but in all honesty this is the first time I have even
heard of this facility. I wonder how many other sysprogs have heard
of this.
I am still liking the hyper doc (or new classification like
installation?) type since it goes the SMP/e rout which everyone knows
about.
Ed
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
