Are we going to need to do an IPL or will the system use the free ASID's to start an Address Space?
-----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Dineen Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 11:35 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: ASID's Questions On Thu, 9 Mar 2006 10:02:28 -0600, Mark Steely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >We are z/OS V1R4. Last night we received the message: > >IEA061E REPLACEMENT ASID SHORTAGE HAS BEEN DETECTED > >The manual states that the RSVNONR is used to replace entries that are >marked non-reusable. I understand why we have entries that are marked >non-reusable, but why is the system using the reserve slots instead of >the free ASID slots. Does this mean we wont be able to start another >address space that marked an entry non-reusable. Any help would be >appreciated. >What values does your site have for RSVNONR and RSVSTRT? > > Mark, We too have had to increase RSVNONR in recent years for address spaces which leave non-reusable entries at termination (ex. WAS recycles). A shortage of RSVNONR is a lousy reason to IPL an LPAR. Here are our specs: RSVNONR=300, 20>100 8/04, >200 01/05, >300 06/05 RSVSTRT=20, RESERVED ASVT ENTRIES Paul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
