On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 09:55:15 +1000, Shane Ginnane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Should I use VLFNOTE ? > >Quick answer - use "TSO %membername". What does that do to change VLF behavior? Using % just changes the search order, so unless there is a program name with the same name as a CLIST being found first, it shouldn't make a difference in regards to VLF caching. >Long answer - updates are always recognised within the boundaries of the >sysplex they originated in. "Always" is perhaps a little strong. "Updates made through IBM-supplied code" is what the fine manual says. http://tinyurl.com/plz3l Radoslaw, how did you make your update? Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.com/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
