I'm asking as the architect of a vendor product - is this what you customer sysprogs would like? Would you like vendor products to get their parametization from a member of the PARMLIB concatenation? Would that be a good thing - one less "special" parm file to keep track of? Or would you perceive it as making the "owners" of application products mess around in a "system" parameter concatenation?
Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shane Ginnane Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 1:17 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Wishing for a JCL based PARMLIB Concatenation search > This may be a dumb question, but has anyone ever heard of or thought of > externalizing the PARMLIB concatenation service? Never seen the need - but fell free to go kick your vendors. Setting up to use IEFPRMLB shouldn't be too difficult for them - the facility is there just waiting to be used. Shane ... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
