No problem, it real easy to miss a line or two.
jamesfs wrote:
Well based on his response, I missed those two lines, then your answer is
obviously correct.
James F Smith
c
-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Of John S. Giltner, Jr.
Sent: 16 March 2006 10:57
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Production Jobs contention with Test Jobs
He responded to me offline, I did include his response. He has
contentions problems between production and test with datasets, VSAM
file and IMS tables.
James Smith wrote:
Problem is we don't know which resources he is talking about. Then again
perhaps neither does he. It may or may not be datasets - could be CPU,
storage, tape units, printers -- did I forget anything??
Jim S
-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Of John S. Giltner, Jr.
Sent: 15 March 2006 10:51
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Production Jobs contention with Test Jobs
Not sure, but why are test jobs using the same datasets, VSAM files, or
IMS tables as production jobs? Shouldn't test be using test and
production using production?
But as others have replied, with the correct job naming convention and
the correct messages (WTO's) being issued an automation package can get
rid of the test job.
Raja Easwaramoorthy wrote:
Most of the time it is either datasets or VSAM files...some times it is
IMS tables
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
