On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 00:00 +0000, Ted MacNEIL wrote: > >Hadn't thought about that. Would be surprised if IFLs got involved, but > I can imagine zAAPs (and zIIPs) might. They are exposed to the MVS > scheduler, and so would conceivably suffer the same interprocess > locking/spin issues. > > I think it's more than lock/spin. > What about just making the decision to move it to a zIIP, zAAP, or zOWIE? > > Especially for short transactions?
Guess I should have said inter-processor. Looks like we've interpreted the initial post differently. I was thinking of a drop in SU/sec delivery, rather than a loss usable MIPs within an LPAR (capture ratio change ???). Patrick can you clarify ???. Shane ... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
