In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 03/25/2006
at 06:33 PM, Chris Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I'm glad other, sharper "problem vultures" have spotted the two - so
>far - flaws in the original code. But the matter here is whether
>issuing a WAIT in a CICS transaction at all is "a good thing" or not.
I'd go farther and say that issuing a wait in a CICS transaction, in
the main task, is forbidden.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html