In a recent note, john gilmore said:

> Date:         Wed, 5 Apr 2006 22:00:49 +0000
> 
> Transmission latency is easily measured and corrected for where it is
> important; and there are both theory and practice for doing so already in
> place, elaborated for use in adjusting and rationalizing the TAI values
> generated by the national observatories that form part of the BIPM network.
> 
The most difficult case is where the round-trip path is asymmetric:
terrestrial in one direction, satellite in the other.  NIST dialup,
at least, can detect this condition but not analyze it -- it refuses
to correct.

> Relativistic mechanics is more interesting that classical, Newtonian
> mechanics; but for the foreseeable future its use here is, unfortunately,
> otiose.
> 
The applicable statement of Special Relativity is that no signal
can propagate faster than the speed of light.  Generalizing
this to Tony H's practical case with far greater latencies,
the statement becomes, "As long as no signal used to coordinate
remote processes propagates faster than the signal used to
synchronize the clocks (even lacking any correction for
propagation delay), no temporal inconsistency can appear among
the various logs."

-- gil
-- 
StorageTek
INFORMATION made POWERFUL

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to